Steps, going up, or down?

1021: Panhala Fort

History is not an ascending spiral of human advance, or even an inch-by-inch crawl to a better world. It is an unending cycle in which changing knowledge interacts with unchanging human needs. Freedom is recurrently won and lost in alternation that includes long periods of anarchy and tyranny, and there is no reason to suppose that this cycle will ever end. In fact, with human power increasing as a result of growing scientific knowledge, it can only become more violent.

The core idea of progress is in the belief that human life becomes better with the growth of knowledge. The error is not in thinking that human life can improve. Rather, it is imagining that improvement can ever be cumulative. Unlike science, ethics and politics are not activities in which what is learnt in one generation can be passed on to an indefinite number of future generations. Like arts, they are practical skills and they are easily lost.

The above two paragraphs from the book, Heresies: Against Progress and Other Illusions, by John Gray, ISBN: 1-86207-718-5

What if the above is true? I think it to be an accurate presentation of the thought and would attest to it – not as much as a change in belief, but more so as recognition of a thought that I never formed.

Human emotion, rather the structured expression of it, is also pretty much like ethics and politics – “practical skills and … easily lost”. I sense a few million guns being pointed at me, as I finish this sentence.

Even if you argue that we accumulate ‘emotional knowledge’ (if there is anything like that), from parents (learn from their mistakes, become better human beings, offer a better world for subsequent generations and the like) and, it is in a way cumulative, why then, human interactions have seen the same signs of struggle for generations? Why haven’t the “futile” (read negative) emotions been overcome over generations?

In an earlier paragraph, the statement, “The illusion is in the belief that it [scientific progress] can effect any fundamental alteration in the human condition.” possibly holds the answer. The human condition, as a society or as an individual is about behaviour. And behaviour does not accumulate over generations; each generation struggles to be better.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Steps, going up, or down?

  1. Unlike science, ethics and politics are not activities in which what is learnt in one generation can be passed on to an indefinite number of future generations. Like arts, they are practical skills and they are easily lost.”..Liked this!!
    But Human emotion, rather the structured expression of it, is also pretty much like ethics and politics – “practical skills and … easily lost”...This is your version..liked more!!
    all and all beautiful post,Atul..

    Like

  2. Human emotion, rather the structured expression of it, is also pretty much like ethics and politics – “practical skills and … easily lost”.

    Huh!! Whaaaat?

    Like

  3. –ganga: thank ye! i have loved this book and every page is a revelation of sorts – not that i agree with everything – but it is a nice POV.

    –rulda: HUhh??? Whaaat? I know youcan do better than that – so what’s the Q and the argument – really? 🙂

    Like

Use your Twitter, Facebook or your WordPress account to comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s